The Effect Of Load Balancing And Failover Of Two Wide Area Networks With Per Connection Classifier Method On Qos Throughput, Packet Loss, Qos Delay, And Qos Jitter Pengaruh Load Balancing dan Failover Dua Wide Area Network Dengan Metode Per Connection Classifier pada QoS Throughput, Packet Loss, QoS delay, dan QoS jitter
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study discussed the design and implementation of load balancing of two WANs so that the traffic load and bandwidth provided by both WANs could be used equally. The methods used in this research were observation and identification, network topology design, implementation, and testing. This study found that load balancing could divide the network load to all available gateways so that there was no overload on the network used by visitors. After implementing load balancing, the network throughput parameter increased 1.51% compared to the Indihome 1 network and 7.5% compared to the Indihome 2 network. The packet loss parameter increased by 99% compared to the Indihome 1 network and increased 90% compared to the Indihome 2 network. Network delay decreased by 1.33% compared to the Indihome 1 network, and decreased by 1.5% compared to the Indihome 2 network. The Network jitter parameter decreased by 0.93% compared to the Indihome 1 network and decreased by 1.54% compared to the Indihome 2 network.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2021 Fajar Hariadi, Pingky Alfa Ray Leo Lede, Umbu Melvy Kalaway
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[2] D. D. Sahari, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Yang Menggunakan Jasa Layanan Indihome Di PT. Telkom Makassar,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Sinergitas Multidisiplin Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 312–216, 2020.
[3] N. D. D, Suradi, and H. Saptono, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Konsumen Mengenai Perubahan Kebijakan PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Telkom) di Semarang pada Layanan Indihome Triple Play,” Diponegoro Law J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017.
[4] U. B. Darma et al., “Pemanfaatan Mikrotik Routerboard untuk Optimasi Bandwidth dan Keamanan Jaringan di PT. Semen Baturaja (Persero) Tbk,” Semin. Has. Penelit. Vokasi, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2020.
[5] A. W. Syaputra and S. Assegaff, “Analisis Dan Implementasi Load Balancing Dengan Metode Nth Pada Jaringan Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Jambi,” Anal. Dan Implementasi Load Balanc. Dengan Metod. Nth Pada Jar. Dinas Pendidik. Provinsi Jambi, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 831–844, 2017.
[6] T. Sukendar, “Keseimbangan Bandwidth Dengan Menggunakan Dua ISP Melalui Metode Nth Load Balancing Berbasiskan Mikrotik,” J. Tek. Komput. Amik Bsi, vol. III, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2017.
[7] R. Pambudi and M. A. Muslim, “Implementasi Policy Base Routing dan Failover Menggunakan Router Mikrotik untuk Membagi Jalur Akses Internet di FMIPA Unnes,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 57, 2017, doi: 10.14710/jtsiskom.5.2.2017.57-61.
[8] H. Kuswanto and T. Rahman, “Failover Gateway Menggunakan Protokol Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) pada Mikrotik Router,” J. Sist. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 60, 2019, doi: 10.26418/justin.v7i1.29482.
[9] G. T. Aji, C. Iswahyudi, and J. Triyono, “Implementasi Teknik Load Balancing Metode Per Connection Classifier (PCC) dengan Fungsi Queue untuk Manajemen Bandwidth (Studi Kasus Pada Laboratorium Komputer Jaringan, Institut Sains & Teknologi AKPRIND Yogyakarta),” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019.
[10] C. A. Pamungkas, “Manajemen Bandwith Menggunakan Mikrotik Routerboard Di Politeknik Indonusa Surakarta,” J. Inf. Politek. Indonusa Surakarta, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 17–22, 2016.